Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: UFC 143 Results: Winners, Losers, And Other Thoughts

IndyCar fan's designs changing opinions about the DeltaWing

An IndyCar fan's "restyling" of the DeltaWing concept in classic Penske Racing colors.

A bold move. The potential savior of Indy-style racing. A grand leap forward in innovation and styling for a moribund racing series.

That is how designer Ben Bowlby and the IndyCar owners behind DeltaWing, LLC look at their new creation.

Not very many IndyCar fans share their perspective - particularly after the foam model was unveiled in Chicago.

But there is one fan out there who does, and he decided that he needed to do his part to get his fellow IndyCar enthusiasts to open their eyes and join him.

Accordingly, he put pen to paper and "reimagined" the DeltaWing on his own. And judging by the results above and the buzz they're creating, he may have achieved his goal... and perhaps he has saved the DeltaWing in the process.

Star-divide

He posts under the name "stpwildcat" at TrackForum.com. He isn't keen on sharing his real name because of his day job as a concept designer for one of the Big 3 automakers.

But he's also an enormous IndyCar fan and has been since he was a young boy growing up in Albuquerque, New Mexico and his favorite racing family - the Unsers - were the stars of the sport. So when he heard about the DeltaWing concept and the way it could change the whole landscape of IndyCar racing for the better, he was sold.

"I feel this concept is the last hope of our series," he says. "Fans need to see that the concept of the DeltaWing is brilliant."

The big hurdle, of course, is the way that form followed function in Bowlby's design. The DeltaWing foam model that Bowlby and company showed at the Chicago Auto Show set off a firestorm of controversy in fan circles. Put bluntly, people hated the way the car looked, and, initially at least, stpwildcat was no exception. "I hated the DeltaWing when I first saw it," he confesses.

But with his artist's imagination and his industry experience, he realized that the fundamental concept was sound. He got the point that DeltaWing, LLC has so far had trouble communicating to the fans - that the foam model is only a first step and that DeltaWings may end up looking radically different depending on who builds them.

So he decided to help out - unbidden and independently - by putting the idea into pictures. Calling upon his design skills, he sketched out a slightly modified version of the DeltaWing with some styling cues and livery design inspired by a classic Penske Racing chassis.

Dwconceptsidexside_medium

The changes were kept to a minimum - a slightly different fairing on the rear wing assembly, a rollbar instead of the airbox-styled structure on the model, a shark fin instead of a vertical stabilizer, and more traditional nose that made the front wheels look more separated.

The small changes he made subtly altered the look of the car without tampering with the overarching concept that the DeltaWing represented. And the fans responded.

"10,000,000 times better," said one. "A huge difference," enthused another. And - perhaps the most promising for the DeltaWing supporters - there were more than a few who said, "I could live with this!"

After a week and a half of threats from fans about leaving the series if the DeltaWing was adopted, this represented a major shift in perception for the DeltaWing concept. All in a day's work for stpwildcat, though.

"The looks of the car [grew] on me, but I know the potential for great looks is always available," he says. "I wanted to show some of our more hard-headed fans that this car can look great. It can look great if it's done right.

"I [was] afraid that the backlash toward the DeltaWing would kill it before it starts. So these drawings are meant to open some eyes and minds."

stpwildcat isn't done yet, either. He's planning a total of six different DeltaWing concepts - including a Foyt Coyote - from several different angles to illustrate the potential for multiple manufacturers. He plans to make them into a booklet and hand them off to someone like Robin Miller, who he hopes can get the sketches into the proper hands. He also says that he is trying to work up the nerve to slip a booklet into his neighbor's mailbox. The neighbor? Roger Penske.

As for DeltaWing, LLC? Since the project is supposed to be open-source, initiative like stpwildcat's is likely to be encouraged - perhaps even rewarded with the opportunity to work with them on designs and consulting. If such an offer was made, stpwildcat makes his position clear: "I would do anything and everything for them... in any way."

Comment 17 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

agree

All I would like to see is Bowlby explain what he expects to be open for change under the “‘open source’ frame work”.

by bever911 on Feb 18, 2010 4:55 PM EST up reply actions  

Agreed

Completely agreed. You basically wrote the comment I wanted to as I read this post. I actually kinda liked the original DWing design, but this.. this concept really raises the bar.

Bill Polian has forgotten more about football than you ever have or ever will know.

by jdb on Feb 18, 2010 3:53 PM EST up reply actions  

still have to wonder...

how can the open source style keep the costs where the IRL is asking it to? I just can’t see how if the 3 manufacturers need exclusive deals to make the price meet the series goals, how can having multiple people manufacture the delta wing make it happen? also, why would swift, dallara, etc be willing to make this car instead of their own?

I’m trying to let the delta wing concept grow on me, and this certainly helps. but until we hear from manufacturers about how they can adopt it, things still seem too far fetched for me.

TN Sports fan in Hoosier Country....

by Evanbio on Feb 18, 2010 3:59 PM EST reply actions  

Some opinions...

I’m not sure how the financials would work. Maybe they’re thinking that the more builders of the DeltaWing there are, the lower the manufacturers will have to charge in order to stay competitive in the marketplace, I dunno.

Conceivably, though, teams could build their OWN DeltaWings since the source material would be openly available. I think part of the thought process from DW is meant to limit the amount to which teams are hamstrung by being limited to specific engine and chassis builders. In that respect, I support the DW concept wholeheartedly because one of the big problems of having an exclusive supplier is that they control all costs and supply and consequently wield too much power as a result.

Thing is, if a DeltaWing is less than half the cost of a current car and the engine spec is opened up thanks to the motor being a non-stressed chassis member, it’s going to get a lot more folks a lot more interested in being involved with IndyCar. If the tech is pioneering (i.e. generating 240mph from 300hp) then a lot of car companies are going to want to use that as a selling point for their products.

You are validating my inherent mistrust of strangers.
Pop Off Valve - A greasy hot tenderloin of IndyCar goodness!

by Tony Johns on Feb 18, 2010 4:07 PM EST up reply actions  

What is the "concept" ??

If we take Chip’s claims that the DW Is a “concept” … then who is going to write the rules that define what is acceptable or not accepable in the way of parts/chassis/engines ?? If I’m Lola and I want to build a DW, what rules/specifications do I have to follow to build a car ??? Or is the current DW a “template” that I have to adhere to ??

If I show up at the track with a chassis that looks like the picture above … who decides if it meets the “rules” … Deltawing LLC ? The IRL ? Or this “comittee” that John Barnes and Ganassi have talked about ?? You still need tech inspectors at the track … who do they work for ??

Seems to me this whole “concept” is very vague … how the league is gonna have these “concepts” on the grid for 2012 is starting to look like a tough schedule to meet. First we gotta wait until the “concept” car gets built and tested … then the rules have to be written (or templates issued) and only then can companies like Swift, Lola, etc. even start to THINK about building a chassis …. and all that time the owners are bleeding money and the ratings continue to sink.

by BadazzZ06 on Feb 18, 2010 5:01 PM EST reply actions  

All good questions.

And I have the same questions, to be honest.

Again, the point of the exercise isn’t to solve EVERY outstanding issue with the DeltaWing concept or car – just to make it more palatable for people to consider. There were and are people who are dismissing the entire thing outright simply because of the way the foam model looks.

There are serious questions for me, for instance, about the Lola concepts. How can they build a car that is nearly identical in most respects to the current car and still say that it’s more efficient, cheaper by half, and so forth? Does all the cost savings come from the commonality aspect so that teams have less inventory?

I think at this point we’re still at the salesman stage. All of the manufacturers are throwing out a sales pitch – the difference is, DeltaWing’s sales pitch has more substance than style, whereas the other manufacturers are the opposite. A lot of the questions you and I have about things won’t get answered until more development work is done on the concept, and that won’t happen until one of the concepts is approved.

You are validating my inherent mistrust of strangers.
Pop Off Valve - A greasy hot tenderloin of IndyCar goodness!

by Tony Johns on Feb 18, 2010 5:09 PM EST up reply actions  

It isn't just how it looks ....

First, let me say that stpwildcat has done an AWESOME job making the DW look somewhat … (geez … I hate to admit this … ) … almost … (gulp) …. kinda …. (cough cough mumble …) good looking.

My problem with the car is the narrow front track. Bowlby stated that he had to do that to improve the aerodynamics of the car. OK, but where does a car with about a 2 foot wide front end have any applicability in the “real world” ???

NASCAR (I’m basing this on estimates from autoextremist.com) gets about 50 to 75 MILLION dollars in direct and in-direct support from EACH auto manufacturer per year … so with Toyota, GM, Chrysler and Ford in that series NASCAR is getting about 200 to 300 MILLION dollars PER YEAR from the manufacturers. Would the IRL kill to see that kind of money ?? You betcha. Why are the manufacturers putting in that kind of money ??? Because they believe that they get payback for it. Now we can argue over the fact the manufacturers are unhappy right now with NASCAR (again, see autoextremist.com) and that there is a reasonable chance that support will be cut back, but the bottom line is the manufacturers see a direct relationship between the dollars they spend versus sales of cars, training of engineers, and advancing technology.

What does the DW project bring to the table if I’m GM, Ford, whomever ?? NOTHING.

Proving you can narrow the front end of the vehicle to about 3 feet and get better gas mileage isn’t a very useful concept if I’m designing an SUV or a family sedan. I already understand the concept that a lighter more aerodynamic vehicle will be more fuel efficient than a heavy vehicle with all kinds of aero impediments like wings. What is the Deltawing proving that would make a manufacturer like Ford come to the series and say “we want to invest 100 million dollars to prove this concept” ??? The concept is already “proved”

Engines ?? Sure it would be great to show that a 300 HP engine can push a car to over 200 MPH … but I can go to my local Subaru dealer TODAY and buy a WRX STI with a 36,000 mile warranty and get 305 HP under the hood … what is the Deltawing proving here …. that you can get 300 HP from an in-line 4 ???? Been there, done that … I can run it on the street with a warranty today.

I’m sorry, but I just don’t see what the Deltawing is out to prove … I can buy a 4 cylinder 300+ HP engine today with a warranty … I know that a car with fenders is more efficient than a car without fenders … and I know that a vehicle with a front end about 3 feet wide is useless on the “street” … How the HE*L is the Deltawing an advancement of technology ???

by BadazzZ06 on Feb 18, 2010 6:17 PM EST up reply actions  

It's an advancement of INDYCAR technology...

…and the auto manufacturers would LOVE to be able to make a commercial saying, “Our engines are so efficient that we can build a small, 300hp motor and have it push an IndyCar to almost 240mph.” Sure, people who are “car guys” might not be impressed but a more casual potential fan might.

But I’m convinced that a great deal of the DeltaWing’s attractiveness as a solution stems from the fact that nobody else races anything remotely similar, and like it or not it GRABS ATTENTION. That’s something a NASCAR stock car doesn’t do anymore, and something that IndyCars haven’t done for almost a decade.

It could be that all of this is much ado about nothing. Who knows what is going through Brian Barnhart’s mind right now (insert your own joke here). It may be the DeltaWing has the shelf life of the Falcon. We’ll have to wait and see.

You are validating my inherent mistrust of strangers.
Pop Off Valve - A greasy hot tenderloin of IndyCar goodness!

by Tony Johns on Feb 18, 2010 6:36 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree with you ... somewhat (insert smiley) ...

I totally agree that the IRL needs to grab attention, and that other race series (ALMS, WoO, NASCAR, etc.) haven’t pulled it off.

The “right answer” (IMHO) is to open up the rules and allow different engine types into the IRL. Imagine a series based on allowing ANY type of engine to be used .. diesel … gasoline … LNG … hybrid … ethanol … whatever … even electric and hybrid systems.

Turn the Indy 500 back to what it originally was … a proving ground for new technologies. and I’m a happy camler

by BadazzZ06 on Feb 18, 2010 8:22 PM EST up reply actions  

Totally with you re: engines.

…which is part of the reason I have hopes for the DW. The buzz is that engine manufacturers are intrigued by the DW and the ability essentially drop an engine into it. The challenge of working with a new power-to-weight ratio as well as the turbo 4 might prove intriguing to the mfrs…

You are validating my inherent mistrust of strangers.
Pop Off Valve - A greasy hot tenderloin of IndyCar goodness!

by Tony Johns on Feb 18, 2010 10:09 PM EST up reply actions  

Even the rendering still looks awful to me.

Anything with that narrow of a front track will never be considered decent looking to me.

DAMN YOU JUJU!!! You make about as little sense as John Clownzano!!!

by CaDuck on Feb 18, 2010 7:12 PM EST reply actions  

I am more of a NASCAR fan but I really want to like Indy Cars too

Definatly some of the best drivers in the world. It just seems that everytime I watch a race there is little passing. Do all the teams use the same setups? Or is all the equipment virtually the same?

Bad pick Peyton "Regular Season" Manning!!!

by Athletic on Feb 22, 2010 11:54 AM EST reply actions  

Welcome!

Most of the problem stems from IndyCar using a “spec” chassis and engine, which puts the advantage into the hands of the richest teams that can afford to R&D the hell out of the spec to get those added .1 and .2 seconds. Another problem is that aerodynamically the current IndyCars experience turbulence when the cars are lined up end to end, so it’s difficult to draft up past a competitor – drivers have to pull out earlier than you can in stock cars and by the time they’re side by side most of the momentum is gone.

A lot of the debate about the 2012 IndyCar spec has to do with changing all of that. DeltaWing supporters believe that the DW will encourage multiple engine manufacturers and differentiated bodies that will shake up the status quo without raising costs through the roof. Whether that’s true in practice is obviously up for debate. But all of the proposals out there now are aimed towards lowering costs and making passing easier.

You are validating my inherent mistrust of strangers.
Pop Off Valve - A greasy hot tenderloin of IndyCar goodness!

by Tony Johns on Feb 22, 2010 4:17 PM EST up reply actions  

I hope so I think the Delta wing looks really cool!

I heard that because of the areo of the Delta wing they could keep the same speeds with half the HP. I also heard it could really cut costs also

Bad pick Peyton "Regular Season" Manning!!!

by Athletic on Feb 23, 2010 1:53 PM EST up reply actions  

You heard right... theoretically at least.

In theory, the DeltaWing will generate 235mph speeds with 300-350hp (turbocharged). Cost targets are less than half of what a current IndyCar and engine package costs.

You are validating my inherent mistrust of strangers.
Pop Off Valve - A greasy hot tenderloin of IndyCar goodness!

by Tony Johns on Feb 23, 2010 3:49 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Pop Off Valve is your one-stop shop for IZOD IndyCar Series news and commentary on the SBNation network.

Join our community and let your voice be heard!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

The SBN Indy 500 Primer

Need to get up to speed on the Indianapolis 500-Mile Race and the famed "Brickyard" - the Indianapolis Motor Speedway? Check out our three-part SBNation Indy 500 Primer:

EMOTICONIC Live Race Chats

In the mood to augment your IZOD IndyCar Series viewing with some well-timed snark and commentary? Join Pop Off Valve for EMOTICONIC Race Chats on race weekend and see the race the way it was meant to be seen!

Click here for details!

The More You Know

About Pop Off Valve

Pop Off Valve [POP awf vālv] - noun 1. A spring-loaded relief mechanism on a turbocharged engine that releases excess pressure within the engine manifold; 2. An IndyCar blog intended to release excess opinion within the fan community.

Acronym: P.O.V.
(see also: Point of View)

"Running my mouth, that's my pop-off valve. It gives me a little bit of relief so I could get back to what I was doing." - Dale Earnhardt, Jr.

Copyright

©2011 Thunderbird Creative Media, LLC.
All rights reserved.

Theunions_medium


Editor-in-Chief

Pop-off2_small Tony Johns

Associate Editors

Wasted_years_av_hd2_small fleshwound_NPG

Correspondents

Dalenixon-thumb_small DaleNixon

Dsc_0344alter_small Scott Whitmore

Sunset_small Brian Neudorff