A 2012 revolution is worth embracing
...And these children that you spit on
As they try to change their worlds
Are immune to your consultations
They're quite aware of what they're going through
Ch-ch-ch-ch-changes
Turn and face the strange ch-ch-changes...
David Bowie, "Changes"
Have you ever worked at a company that has gotten bought out by or has merged with a new parent business? If you have, then you know the feeling of panic and unrest that settles in when the new overlords show up with ingratiating smiles, chintzy corporate gifts with your new logo, and a medium-sized novel filled with new rules and office procedures that you must accept on pain of termination.
Some of that feeling has trickled into the IndyCar fan community with the news that the IndyCar folks are planning on a new chassis for 2012.
Why? Because they've heard some things about the so-called Delta Wing, which will be unveiled next week at the Chicago Auto Show. They've seen concept images from Dallara Automobili, the company that builds the current chassis. And some of the concepts are so revolutionary that many long-time IndyCar fans can't seem to wrap their minds around them.
One side effect of a 15-year philosophical war on the proper direction of open-wheel racing is that, like a World War I army battalion, many fans have dug trenches in which they have hidden themselves and their opinions against the specter of change.It's something of an irony considering the dynamic and ever-changing landscape that was Indianapolis in the heady days of innovation. But the attitude also has roots in the native sentimentality that humans possess about their youth - the "good old days," as it were. Sports fans are also naturally resistant to change because they feel that change will destroy what made them fans in the first place.
A combination of all of this is to blame for some of the reactions to the new concept cars on the table for the 2012 IndyCar season. The tone ranges from mild skepticism to the belief that the new car will be another catastrophe in a year destined for them.

Let me offer an example. One interesting comment I read was that the concept above from Dallara looked "like a Hot Wheels car." Other folks thought that the way the rear of the chassis bracketed the wheels betrayed the idea of an open-wheel formula - "You might as well put fenders on it," they said.

Another Dallara concept (shown above) reminded some of the more hardcore fans too much of the ill-fated Panoz DP-01 Champ Car. The fact that the DP-01 incorporated significant advances in racecar technology not seen in Indy-style car design in over a decade fell to the wayside in favor of a general distrust because the car was... well, a Champ Car and not an IndyCar.
Ironically enough, these Dallara concepts are rather less extreme than many of the other futuristic concepts that have been put forth in recent months. If these cars are too much of a departure, just wait until the Delta Wing is unveiled... or, for that matter, the concept designs expected soon from Lola and Swift.
Now, this is America and everyone is entitled to freedom of speech. Additionally, the Internet has assured everyone with an opinion that they will have a forum to express it. So I don't begrudge people their skepticism or even outright dislike of concepts that are revolutionary rather than evolutionary.
But come on. When was the last time the IndyCar Series stood for innovation and forward thinking? At least outside of the rarified atmosphere embodied in press releases? What's so wrong about a car that looks like a Hot Wheels toy? I remember as a kid that I loved shopping for the really cool-looking Hot Wheels and Matchbox cars. I hate to say it, but the majority of American kids don't buy Dallara 1/64th scale toy cars to play with. They buy the Hot Wheels. Imagine if those Hot Wheels they drive around on their living room rugs showed up for real at an honest-to-goodness racetrack. You don't think they'd be excited and want to see more?
Here's my point. The time for being frightened of brave new worlds is over. The trench-digging philosophy didn't work in World War I and it's not going to work in IndyCar. To move forward, one must be ready to take steps - sometimes big ones - over uncharted ground.
A while ago, the IndyCar folks held a tweetup at the IMS Museum. The Museum is a nirvana for car guys and gals, because a whole century of auto racing innovation is there for the devouring. There's one section of the Museum that has a lineup of race cars that have won the 500-Mile Race from the earliest days to the present. And you can't help but notice that when the lineup reaches a certain era, the cars all start to look the same.
Would it be so bad for the 2012 IndyCar to represent a revolution, even if it shakes the very core of what an IndyCar looks like? If ever there was a racing series in need of a shakeup, IndyCar is it. It's been far too long since we have had to face the unknown in the sport in any other capacity besides finances and car counts.
0 recs |
2 comments
|
Comments
Great points
I agree Tony. I’d like something that races well and is a big change.
Even though it didn’t work, Jimmy Daywalt, a guy from my hometown, showed up to race a fairly radical design in ‘55, the Sumar Special. Even though it didn’t race that way, its wheels weren’t exactly open.

Great Take
Like you, I do not understand the current gnashing of teeth and rending of garments in respone to the Dallara teasers. Two of them look pretty darn similar to what we’ve seen in the past (or present). The other one looks different, but I think that by Watkins Glen of 2012, most folks would be pretty used to it. It seems like in the current age of internet “best ever/worst ever” dialogue, everybody has to dub these cars as capable of curing cancer (if you like them) or the worst thing since communism (if you don’t). The cars are neither of these, and nothing that we see at the Chicago Auto Show this week will be, either. They’re race cars. Some folks will like them, some won’t. Some folks (the Europeans) hated the roadsters. Some folks (a lot of Americans) hated the rear engined cars. You’ll never get consensus, because peoples’ tastes differ wildly.
The thing is, if they’re trying to reduce downforce and drag on the new car, that “weirdo” concept looks like a pretty good way to do it: small front and rear wings with limited downforce-creating surfaces, and relatively large tunnels, a la the early-‘80s Eagle chassis, with its Boundary Layer Adhesion Technology (and I’m not the only one who’s seen the similarity there). It’s sort of a re-think of what ChampCar was doing with the DP-01: make most of your downforce with the underbody, so that you can follow closer to the car in front without losing a ton of wing-created downforce. Great idea, right? So how’s about we withhold judgement until we hear about how the cars might race each other?
Like you say, it’s been forever since we’ve seen anything truly “new” at the Speedway. Look at any 15-year period of the sport’s history. 1945 to 1960? Pretty big evolution. 1960 to 1975? A giant leap forward. 1980 to 1995? Somewhat similar cars, but a going in the direction of perfecting the turbo/downforce formula. 1997-2011? Hmmm. Little aero tweaks, but that’s about it. The 3.0-4.0 liter normally aspirated / 2.65 liter turbo formula of car has gone just about as far as it possibly can, due to every team employing multiple engineers, data acquisition techs and available wind tunnel time. What’s needed is a true shake-up of what IndyCars are. It doesn’t even have to be something seismic, like going to hydrogen or hybrid powerplants. Just make a big cut to engine size (which is the direction the “real world” is going – small, turbocharged engines), put substantial limits on aerodynamic aids (because they have almost no crossover to road cars, anyway, and they tend to ruin the racing by affecting how following cars react), make them affordable so that we can get 25-30 teams for every race and 40+ for the 500, make it look acceptable as a car that goes fast, and there you go.
Anyway, I’m just glad to read somebody who’s not jumping up and down about how great or how terrible the Dallaras are. Great post.
by The Speedgeek on Feb 6, 2010 11:54 AM EST reply actions 1 recs

by 












