Should Milka be done-o?
I was watching the IndyCar Grand Prix of Alabama at Barber Motorsports Park yesterday, and at one point I realized I hadn't seen a single glimpse of Milka Duno's CITGO Dallara. According to timing and scoring, she wasn't even in last place.
That, to me, was a good thing - so far this year, we've seen the car on TV for all the wrong reasons. Spinning on the pace lap here, going off course there, looming like a slow-moving spectre in front of the leaders. I was hoping that maybe she was finally starting to show a little progress.
Watching Milka Duno try to race an IndyCar always leaves me torn. She is clearly out of her depth driving a winged open-wheel car at this level, but I can't forget how wonderfully personable, good-natured and intelligent she is. That latter fact always fools me into thinking she just needs a little more time to learn the craft before she can at least drive without being a hazard.
But yesterday finally cured me of that. Maybe earlier this season I might have been annoyed by the #ParkMilka trend that Nicole Manske Briscoe started on Twitter, but what happened yesterday finally has me on the bandwagon.
What finally convinced me? It was the sudden and jarring appearance of Duno's #18 in traffic, moving painfully slowly as other cars desperately bobbed and weaved to avoid her.
Usually slower cars, when shown the blue flag with the yellow stripe that means "Let Faster Cars Pass," give way to faster cars by abdicating the line and giving plenty of room for them to overtake. Duno, however, did none of that. Whether she panicked or, worse, she didn't know better, Milka had chosen the center of the track as her "out of the way" spot and had slowed to less than half of race pace. In that moment she was a clear danger to everyone around her.
In that moment, race control should have parked her.
Why the Iron Hand of Justice in race control didn't - and, to date, hasn't - is a mystery to me. Quick to pick out every block, every violation of pit lane speeding, and other various and sundry missteps by other drivers, they were conspicuously silent on this day as they seem to have been on all of the preceding race days with regards to Milka Duno.
But what I saw - what everyone saw - was not simply a failure to go fast. Milka has shown speed at times and without traffic around her is capable of going faster than most armchair racers like myself. But what she displayed at Barber and what makes her... well, there's no other way to put it, dangerous, was a spectacular and potentially tragic lack of basic racecraft.
Hugo Chavez' money might buy enough speed for a race team to compete, but it can't purchase race smarts. Those are learned on the way up the racing ladder - those who do not learn those lessons either stop progressing up the ladder on their own or are forced off of it by their peers, race control, or - in the worst case - serious injury or even death.
Milka's inability to allow faster cars past her safely is more than simply worrisome - it is hazardous. Whether it is a result of panic behind the wheel or incompetence or simply going overboard in trying to be courteous, her performance - or lack thereof - is putting the other drivers in the series at risk.
The IndyCar series took the extraordinary measure to park Marty Roth under similar circumstances. They need to do so again. And perhaps they need to look into establishing rules on race pace and set up additional guidelines that establish a minimum standard for racecraft. Maybe they even have all of that already - which begs the question, if that's true, why haven't they applied them to Milka?
I've been willing to give Milka the benefit of the doubt - in fact, I've stretched "benefit of the doubt" so far that it's almost screaming for mercy - but the time for the experiment is over. Milka Duno may yet have a successful career in motorsports but - as harsh as this may sound - it should not continue with the IZOD IndyCar Series.
It's for everyone's own good.
10 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Should she have been parked? Yes.
But allow me for a moment to express how unprofessional I found Nicole Manske-Briscoe’s use of twitter yesterday. Despite being a motor racing journalist, she felt it would be wise to use her husband’s twitter account to help start the #ParkMilka movement. Journalists aren’t supposed to become part of the story, and she made sure she put herself front and center in the story because of her actions.
I love to play baseball. I'm a baseball player. I've always been a baseball player. I'm still a baseball player. That's who I am. - Ryne Sandberg
I agree.
She’s trying to wear two hats – racing journalist and wife of a racer. Maybe she thought that since she was talking about IndyCar and she covers NASCAR, it was okay… not so much.
You are validating my inherent mistrust of strangers.
Pop Off Valve - A greasy hot tenderloin of IndyCar goodness!
I agree with th idea of the "Tweet,
However the actual message seems as you stated, unprofessional.
Self-anointed President of the Kenjon Barner fan club.
Yes.
This has been another episode of Simple Answers To Simple Questions.
Tune in next week when we answer “Does the IICS need a new chassis?”
Bill Polian has forgotten more about football than you ever have or ever will know.
Sometimes the self-evident needs to be expressed because others cannot see the obvious.
You are validating my inherent mistrust of strangers.
Pop Off Valve - A greasy hot tenderloin of IndyCar goodness!
I totally agree
My comment wasn’t made as a dig at the necessity of your post. More of a dig at anyone who doesn’t see the obvious at this point. :)
Bill Polian has forgotten more about football than you ever have or ever will know.
Yes, That Comment IS Way Overboard
But that is sadly, not the first time Tony has written something like that,. Usually, I agree with much of what Tony writes, but even though I am no fan of Milka Duno’s driving, that is still hyperbole which shows an inability to produce a logical argument. One doesn’t need to produce propaganda when one can reason intelligently.
On a related note, on another IndyCar site-Theotherside by Matt Chamois-sorry I can’t do links-has a rumor that the IndyCar series is trying behind the scenes to park Milka by encouraging her to become a team owner, thus keeping the car-and the financing-in the series while getting her out of the car gracefully and allowing her to save face. Hopefully, this or something similar can happen, because Milka certainly can be an off-track asset to the series, but she is certainly a danger on the track.
by Ironcurtianantihero on Apr 13, 2010 8:46 PM EDT reply actions
Addressing the rumor
If that rumor is true, what good does that do Dale Coyne? I mean, Andy has made a crusade about keeping the Boy Scout car in the series at all costs, which is what I was addressing with my “hyperbole” – if Milka becomes a team owner, what does that do to save the jobs that would be lost at DCR?
Milka is not there to be a Sarah Fisher. She’s there to drive, and her money is giving her the chance to do it. She has no interest in owning a team or else she’d already be wearing that hat. If – and this is a big “if” – she ever learns the necessary fundamental racecraft it takes to race without being a hazard, then mas alla and good for her. She definitely has the intelligence, so whatever is making her more than just a backmarker is instinct, or lack of it. That sort of thing cannot be taught – it either has to be developed or it will never make itself known.
As GroundedEffects says, there have always been backmarkers – but most of them have enough sense to be able to stay out of the way. The ones who haven’t had that sense historically have not lasted long in the series, either because of their own initiative to do something else or because they were forced out. Milka’s rather large insurance policy precludes her team showing her the door and she’s shown no sign of taking that step on her own, so the remaining options are rather limited.
I haven’t done a lot of real-life racing so I’m an easy target for people who like to question my bona fides… but I’ve done enough to know that having a driver on the same track with you that has a lack of situational awareness of this magnitude is more than a simple inconvenience. I don’t care whether it’s done behind closed doors or if race control parks her mid-race – unless Milka has a “come to Jesus” moment and figures out what she’s lacking in basic racecraft, she represents a real hazard.
You are validating my inherent mistrust of strangers.
Pop Off Valve - A greasy hot tenderloin of IndyCar goodness!
Hear me out...
I’ve been back and forth on this issue in my head many times and while she certainly doesn’t seem to have the ability to barely even compete with the bottom half of the IndyCar driver pool, the chief problem I see is that we complain so much about her. I didn’t see the same “danger” she posed that perhaps others did (inconvenience, no question) and I have to agree with JagTechOhio on this one.
Backmarkers have always existed in IndyCar and many other forms of racing whether by lack of skill or equipment and for whatever the reason. If you look back to the ‘glory days’ of IndyCar circa 1970s and 80s all but the best 3 or 4 cars typically finished on the lead lap (ovals AND roads), and a top 10 finish meant you were within 5 to 10 laps of the leader.
Don’t believe me? Here is a great and simple site to see the evidence – http://www.champcarstats.com/Year.htm
Compare some finishes there with the most recent race at Barber found here:
http://www.indycar.com/var/assets/indycar-race-lapfinal2.pdf
The kinds of gaps between winner and 10th back in the 1980s aren’t even fathomed by many who watch the sport now. It would seem we’ve been fairly spoiled over the last 15 years by how close the racing is in this series and a whole generation can’t imagine watching a race with such disparity as there was in ‘the good old days’.
As much as it may or may not pain him to say, Dale Coyne needs her and I honestly don’t think IndyCar is in any worse shape because she is here. She apparently has met all the requirements to race in the IndyCar series.
If her ability to bring money to a team, be good with fans, not destroy equipment, is not a PR nightmare (see: Roethlisberger or Arenas), and doesn’t create more than an general inconvenience to other drivers, isn’t good enough, then perhaps the issue should be in addressing the qualifications to race in the IndyCar series.
Any drivers or driver’s significant others/representatives that whine about her publicly, certainly have the right, but must also consider that they do more harm to the series than does Milka. It is a league competition matter to be addressed, certainly, but behind closed doors with those who run the show, not in the realms of Twitter by observers.
by GroundedEffects on Apr 14, 2010 9:58 AM EDT reply actions
2 things....
One, it appeared that Alex Lloyd at times was pretty much a hazard on the track as well (not as bad, but still). Is some of the blame on the race team not being able to produce a car that can get up to speed? Just a thought, as I was at the race and saw Lloyd being passed similarly to Duno several times.
Two, could the officials not throw a black flag for Milka? It’s probably too late to institute something like a 105% rule for the races, but if a driver does not obey the race officials flagging to move over, they should black flag them and solve the problem that way.
TN Sports fan in Hoosier Country....

by 











