Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Dissecting Nick Diaz's Positive Drug Test

Manufacturers' best bet for 2012: Go "all in"

INDIANAPOLIS - JULY 14: General view of the IZOD IndyCar Series chassis strategy announcement at the Indianapolis Museum of Art on July 14 2010 in Indianapolis Indiana. (Photo by Michael Hickey/Getty Images)

So we have the basic outline of the 2012 IndyCar. A standard "safety cell" built by Dallara, with open (within reason) aerodynamic development on key body pieces and open (within specs) engine development.

In theory - or at least in the theory of those who came up with the idea - you have the maximum amount of flexibility allowed within a narrow set of cost constraints. You can theoretically have a field of 33 completely unique-looking racecars at Indianapolis, all powered by a handful of different engines. Variety - without breaking the bank. That's the idea.

The most breathless supporters of the new rules package - or, rather, philosophical package, since the rules haven't been written yet - believe that we'll see a half-dozen different engine builders from big companies to independents, and "aero kit" manufacturers from the aerospace sector. The idea of a Honda twin-turbo V6-powered Dallara squaring off against a Cosworth-powered "Lotus" is one that most people expect; the most optimistic also hope to see a Ford turbo-inline-4 with, say, Boeing bodywork at some point in the future.

It probably isn't going to work that way, though. Obviously we still need to wait and see how the actual rules shake out, but the most reasonable expectation is that the way new manufacturers are going to get involved with the 2012 philosophy is by creating a "total solution" - an engine and aerodynamic package that together would work to offset the built-in advantage enjoyed by Honda and their years of R&D.

Star-divide

It's going to take many millions of dollars to perfect one of these packages - from designing the engine to R&D in the wind tunnels and on the test track - before it's ready for competition. Those millions spent in development make the $70,000 price point at which the aero kit must be made available to all teams look like a child's allowance. It's too much to spend on either one solution or the other - the powerplant or the aerodynamic kit - because the money spent to develop one is wasted if it is paired with a complementary piece of the other that does not exploit the former's advantages to the fullest.

So the best "bang for the buck" will likely involve one big company creating a single, comprehensive package to employ on the Dallara "safety cell." That's not necessarily to say that a single builder will create both engine and aero kit; however, the pieces - whoever builds them - have to be developed, tested and released in tandem in order to produce any sort of competitive value on the track or promotional value off of it. 

Therefore, you're more likely to see a small group of consortia creating integrated IndyCar "platforms" than you are to see a renaissance of the Indianapolis-based parts and tech shops that once serviced the sport. You might see Ford create an engine and aero package that, according to the ICONIC philosophy, would result in a "Ford IndyCar"; or perhaps you could see a "Ferrari IndyCar" or a "Maybach Indy Special." But what you likely won't see is a "Buick Coyote" or a "Chevrolet Swift." It simply doesn't make fiscal or competitive sense.

You will, however, probably see a "Penske Honda" or a "Ganassi Honda" out there - at least in 2012. The way it's looking right now, the soonest a competing engine developer will reach the IndyCar series looks to be 2013, which means that Honda would continue to be the sole engine supplier for the league. But Penske and Ganassi have already spent years developing and building their own custom Dallara parts. The only difference between then and now is that some other teams might get the chance to use them as well.

The upshot to all of this, it should be noted, is that 2012 is not going to be the world-ending catastrophe or gigantic letdown that many cynics believe it will. It's just that the way things shake out will not look quite how many thought it would. Don't count Randy Bernard out, though - he's a hell of a salesman. Odds are good that we'll see one or more big companies decide to go "all in" on the IZOD IndyCar Series when the new rules take effect.

Comment 7 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

One or more companies going "all-in"?

What is this based on Tony?

Ford’s Eco Boost engine from Roush Yates is available and is being developed for LMP2 racing. It’s a cheap production engine that must be available to buy for no more than $70,000 and has to go 30 hours between rebuilds. It includes many bog standard parts and that is what Ford want as for them and pretty much every manufacturer now, it has to be about relevance. That comes directly from the company who helped Ford, Roush-Yates develop the program for sportscar racing.

This engine won’t be used in IndyCar because this chassis will need a bespoke (stressed) racing engine that no major manufacturer wants to build from scratch. Cosworth have quoted development costs of $10M to build a version of Honda’s engine. The only company who would consider this is Lotus, who already have significant technology partnership with Cosworth, who will be developing the engines for the new Evora and Exige. Those engines are based on Toyota power plants. Lotus are also unique insofar as they are ‘brand led’ and have indicated that they are happy to run a Honda powered car as long as it is under the ‘Team Lotus’ banner.

So which company, besides Lotus, is going to go “all-in” with an engine and body kit? With non-stressed engines ruled out, the investment is going to be enormous for any manufacturer. Based on what I know and who I have talked to, I simply don’t see any.

Honda/HPD have effectively got their way by forcing Indy’s hand with regards to engine regulations and they will have pretty much an open playing field.

by Declan Brennan on Aug 12, 2010 1:13 PM EDT reply actions  

Bespoke engines...

Dex, from what I hear there is a possibility of non-stressed engines being used in the “safety cell” – whether by design or via some sort of cradle. It is not 100% certain that the “safety cell” will REQUIRE stressed engines.

I agree that if the SC requires a purpose-built bespoke engine that the number of interested parties will be reduced drastically, but like I mentioned in the article THERE ARE NO RULES WRITTEN YET for any of this – just philosophies and guidelines. There’s still a chance, in other words, for a couple of things to be straightened out.

You are validating my inherent mistrust of strangers.
Pop Off Valve - A greasy hot tenderloin of IndyCar goodness!

by Tony Johns on Aug 12, 2010 2:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

Stressed engines

Tony,

Nobody I have talked to believes there will be anything other than a stressed engine option.

Have you seen Marshall Pruett’s response to one of the questions in Miller’s mail bag that was published today?

You seem to be clinging to ‘hope’ and ‘possibility’ while all the indicators point to 30-33 Honda engined Dallaras at Indy 2012. If you don’t believe me, go and ask the team owners.

Dex

by Declan Brennan on Aug 12, 2010 2:33 PM EDT reply actions  

Clinging?

I’m not clinging to anything, Dex – any more than you’re “clinging” to your “indicators” about Honda/Dallaras. The fact is, the rules haven’t been written yet, so we don’t know whether the “safety cell” is going to require a bespoke engine. You say you’ve talked to people who have told you that there will only be a stressed engine and nothing else – have they written the rules, then?

As for talking to the team owners, I don’t trust them on anything any farther than I can throw them or, for that matter, any more than I can afford to pay to drive one of their cars. :P

You are validating my inherent mistrust of strangers.
Pop Off Valve - A greasy hot tenderloin of IndyCar goodness!

by Tony Johns on Aug 12, 2010 2:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

fair enough

Tony,

Believe what you want. I spent the early part of this week talking to people who are either following this very closely or were deeply involved in the whole pitching process. I know what I’m talking about and I stand by it.

The engine rules have essentially been written and they were basically done so on Honda’s terms.

Believe what you like.

Dex

by Declan Brennan on Aug 12, 2010 3:06 PM EDT reply actions  

Thanks, I will.

Until there are actual written rules, all that there is is opinion. You defend yours, I defend mine. The likelihood of your opinion being right is certainly higher than that of mine being correct, I’ll grant you that. But neither of us deserves to castigate the other for holding an opinion in absence of concrete fact, agreed?

You are validating my inherent mistrust of strangers.
Pop Off Valve - A greasy hot tenderloin of IndyCar goodness!

by Tony Johns on Aug 12, 2010 3:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

Stressed engines 2012

I see that I am a little late to the conversation, but I felt that I should put in my thoughts.

If the IRL decides to go with a stressed member, they are idiots. The reason I say that is, is because there are already plenty of engines out there now that can be dropped into the 2012 chassis if it’s not a stressed engine. If they choose the to with a stressed engine that will severely limit the amount of interested parties which in turn will hurt the overall goal of the ICONIC Committee, which is more diversity. So as you can see having a stressed engine is completely contradictory to what should/needs to happen!

By the way, the last I heard/read is that Randy Bernard was strongly considering production based engines, for my exact above stated reason!

As far as manufacturers going “all in” go; I would like to Lotus and Cosworth, Ford, Honda (already half way there), and Mazda. All of which have current production built or purpose built engines that fit perfectly in with the current limited details we have on the engine specs. And, correct me if I am wrong, but I do believe that they all also have wind tunnels and the engineering and manufacturing capabilities to build aero kits.

by iKingston on Aug 19, 2010 10:25 AM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Pop Off Valve is your one-stop shop for IZOD IndyCar Series news and commentary on the SBNation network.

Join our community and let your voice be heard!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

The SBN Indy 500 Primer

Need to get up to speed on the Indianapolis 500-Mile Race and the famed "Brickyard" - the Indianapolis Motor Speedway? Check out our three-part SBNation Indy 500 Primer:

EMOTICONIC Live Race Chats

In the mood to augment your IZOD IndyCar Series viewing with some well-timed snark and commentary? Join Pop Off Valve for EMOTICONIC Race Chats on race weekend and see the race the way it was meant to be seen!

Click here for details!

The More You Know

About Pop Off Valve

Pop Off Valve [POP awf vālv] - noun 1. A spring-loaded relief mechanism on a turbocharged engine that releases excess pressure within the engine manifold; 2. An IndyCar blog intended to release excess opinion within the fan community.

Acronym: P.O.V.
(see also: Point of View)

"Running my mouth, that's my pop-off valve. It gives me a little bit of relief so I could get back to what I was doing." - Dale Earnhardt, Jr.

Copyright

©2011 Thunderbird Creative Media, LLC.
All rights reserved.

Theunions_medium


Editor-in-Chief

Pop-off2_small Tony Johns

Associate Editors

Wasted_years_av_hd2_small fleshwound_NPG

Correspondents

Dalenixon-thumb_small DaleNixon

Dsc_0344alter_small Scott Whitmore

Sunset_small Brian Neudorff