Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Kentucky Basketball: Where the Wildcats Stand as of Today

Defending Randy Bernard

Photo

For nearly as long as I've been alive - and probably longer, if I bothered to ask older fans than myself - the go-to policy for assigning blame for INDYCAR's and its predecessors' woes is a simple one.

Blame the CEO.

This is otherwise known as "scapegoating." The term itself refers to the ancient, stupid practice of symbolically loading evil onto an actual goat and either expelling it from town or actually killing it, because screw personal responsibility, right? In smaller-brained times, this was a way for people to feel better about themselves and hopefully avoid the wrath of their deity or deities of choice by blaming it on something else.

As ridiculous as this sounds to supposedly civilized folk as ourselves, the impulse behind it is something we definitely have not outgrown. People just don't seem to be capable of understanding that things sometimes just happen and that there may actually not be any sort of intelligent or comprehensible reason why. So people invoke God or Fate or karma or kismet for the good stuff (or the bad stuff that happens to other people who don't have the right faith credentials), and then blame Satan or the evils of a certain subset of their fellowmen when things go to shit.

It's deflection of blame, and it's a coping mechanism because the alternate answers may be too disturbing or uncomfortable for people to face.

Star-divide

It is also an injustice, because bad things that happen that aren't a matter of random chance (and let's be honest, there are plenty of those) usually happen because of a chain of related events, not because of the actions of one single person or cause.

But it's become a sick tradition of sorts to name the CEO of INDYCAR (or CART or USAC or the IRL or whoever) as the ideal fall guy for everything bad that happens. Andrew Craig, Tony George, Bobby Rahal, Chris Pook... the list in the fans' Hall of Shame is long and distinguished. Some of these gentlefolk have been more culpable than others for failures in open-wheel racing, but none of them operated alone or in a vacuum. Yet they are often and mercilessly singled out for vitriol when others who could and should share the blame go unrecognized.

The scapegoating process, however, has reached its clear nadir in the wake of Dan Wheldon's death with the attacks on Randy Bernard.

Media and fans like have been on the prowl for someone or something upon whom to pin the horrifying 15-car crash at Las Vegas Motor Speedway, and Bernard has become the easy target for a small but vocal group.

Under Bernard's watch, the critics say, danger in IndyCar racing is at an all-time high. Double-file restarts! Five million dollar gimmicks! 34 cars starting a race at a 1.5-mile track! Who won't he kill to get better ratings??? Okay, so that last part hasn't been said by anyone out loud. But I'll bet you Danica Patrick's annual earnings that many of these critics have thought it.

Here's the thing about Randy Bernard that these people don't care to understand: he's a salesman. That's about it. He's a relatively young guy with graying hair and probably not the best public speaking technique who spends nearly every waking moment - and since he doesn't sleep much, there are a lot of those - trying to figure out ways to get more public attention to the company with which he's been entrusted.

Prior to taking the CEO job at INDYCAR, he knew almost nothing about racing. Basically, what he knew was that INDYCAR was a property that was in desperate straits and needed promotional punch. So he went about doing that as best as he could, learning as quickly as he could on the job.

His first task was a nightmare that nobody sane would touch with a ten-foot pole - figuring out whether IndyCar should have a new car or stick with its aging Dallara IR03 fleet. Bernard was faced with the Delta Wing lobbyists on one side, penny-pinching team owners on another, and vocal fans on a third. Everyone wanted something different, and everyone was threatening to bolt if they didn't get what they wanted.

What did Randy Bernard do? He gathered the brightest minds he could find together into a committee and asked them to make sense of the mess for him. Once they presented him their findings, he came up with a solution - a new "baseline" car designed by Dallara that would be modifiable by third party builders with aero kits, and a new engine formula that piqued the interest of manufacturers around the world who had politely, but firmly, ignored INDYCAR for years.

Given the incredible political pressure from so many different sides, the ICONIC process was a masterstroke of compromise. It was the closest thing to letting everyone have their cake and eat it too that anyone could have expected, and it was accomplished on short notice. INDYCAR would have a new car, new engines, a new factory in Speedway that would create jobs, and a formula that encouraged future interest from outside manufacturers.

For a guy who had spent the previous decade trying to avoid bull droppings (literal and figurative) while building Professional Bull Riders into an improbable success story, it certainly was a tremendous first step into racing. But then, it wouldn't be INDYCAR without people criticizing the whole thing, whether it was the Delta Wing group complaining that Randy was not far-sighted enough, fans saying they preferred Swift/Lola/BAT concepts, or media lambasting the hologram used at the ICONIC rollout presser.

Still, over the course of Randy Bernard's tenure, the conventional wisdom has been - at least until two weeks ago - that he's done more to help INDYCAR struggle back to relevance than anyone since the Split. He was INDYCAR's everyman spokesman, acquiescing to being the public face for the owners' suggestion to implement double-file restarts, communicating with fans as if they had a voice in the process, and tirelessly globetrotting to drum up partners for the series.

The punsters were right - Las Vegas was going to be Randy's biggest gamble. Bernard knew Las Vegas and loved it - the city was one of the cornerstones of his PBR success story. Vegas was a place where he knew he could make a splash, and he had the connections to make it happen. So he drew up plans for what he hoped would be an unforgettable weekend - a weekend that would catapult INDYCAR into the national spotlight.

Many of Randy's slow-fuse deals would come to fruition at Las Vegas - the introduction of the Ascot Cup as the sanction's new historic championship trophy, for one; an unprecedented field thanks to the surplus inventory of race cars and owners willing to put drivers in them; even the $5 million GoDaddy Challenge, which he saved from the trash heap by calling an audible when the original idea hit unsurmountable obstacles.

He staged lavish parties. He wined and dined sponsors and media. He even got the famed Strip shut down so that the IndyCar field could take laps in front of thousands of curious spectators. In other words, he expended every effort, called in every favor, and put his entire career on the line to make sure that this would be the biggest event outside of the Indianapolis 500 that INDYCAR had ever staged.

From a salesman's perspective, it was nothing less than a coup. The specters of Gene Simmons and Dr. Jack Miller seemed banished by this aggressive promotional campaign. The stage had been set in grand style. Now it was time for Randy Bernard to sit back and hope that the show would deliver on the promise.

And then... disaster.

Suddenly, the enthusiasm with which Randy's promotional efforts had been met turned overnight into second-guessing and finger-pointing. Randy mortgaged the drivers' futures to chase ratings. Randy's irresponsible promotion goaded the drivers into taking more risks. Randy... Randy... Randy.

All of this ignoring the one glaring truth that is the linchpin to everything - Randy, like all of us, became a spectator the minute the race cars hit the track. He had controlled everything that he could control; but his sales pitch did not - could not - affect the actual product. That was in the hands of the drivers, the teams, the track surface, and Fate.

At the end of the day, Dan Wheldon was dead and the INDYCAR world was in mourning. But the groundwork for this tragedy had been laid years before Randy Bernard turned in his cowboy hat for an IZOD cap. The product Bernard had been exhausting himself to sell had been built seven years earlier under the watch of an entirely different group of people.

This, therefore, is the injustice - that Randy Bernard is now somehow culpable for the result of actions and events over which he had absolutely zero control.

The fact that scapegoating is a natural human instinct in times of tragedy does not excuse those doing the scapegoating. It is irresponsible. Ridiculous. Even insulting. Those who are scapegoating Randy Bernard are trying to make themselves feel better by creating a false construct.

In truth, we are all to blame for forgetting one thing - that motor racing is dangerous, and that the sport will never be completely free from this kind of tragedy. The death of MotoGP racer Marco Simoncelli a week after Wheldon perished should have proclaimed this truth in giant letters created from stone.

Of all the injustices, perceived or real, having to do with that fateful weekend in Las Vegas, the worst would be if Randy Bernard is pressured into leaving INDYCAR. And I promise you that Dan Wheldon, were he still with us, would be at the head of the line to defend Randy from these ludicrous scapegoaters.

There are many things to learn from what happened in Las Vegas - I hope that one of them is that others should not suffer needlessly as the displaced focus of our grief... or guilt.

Comment 7 comments  |  2 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Passing The Buck Again

The buck has been passed around plenty enough. To the drivers … who are the pilots afterall. To the fans … who don’t show to races. To the networks … for not providing decent packages. To race control … for poor officiating.

Stop passing the buck. It needs to stop somewhere … or indycar is forever doomed.

by speedwaysusan on Oct 24, 2011 6:22 PM EDT reply actions  

This is not "passing the buck."

It is defending someone who does not deserve the blame he is getting from people who frankly don’t know what they’re talking about.

“Stopping the buck” in the wrong place is injustice. It does nothing to help INDYCAR whatsoever.

You are validating my inherent mistrust of strangers.
Pop Off Valve - A greasy hot tenderloin of IndyCar goodness!

by Tony Johns on Oct 24, 2011 6:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'd like to see Speedwaysusan here actually elucidate on where the buck's supposed to stop.

Let’s see the analysis.

--------
"First they came for the ugly, and I did not speak out because I was not ugly.
Then they came for the nerds, and I did not speak out because D&D IS A RESPECTABLE GAME WITH A LARGE PLAYERBASE OK MOM???
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out because let's be real they always come for the Jews.
Then they came for me, and I did not speak out because they actually came for me back when they came for the nerds."

--
"How can a pickup truck contain enough mass to unfold into a towering machine? I say if Ringling Brothers can get 15 clowns into a Volkswagen, anything is possible."

Roger Ebert, Transformers review.

by E.M.H. on Oct 26, 2011 8:36 AM EDT up reply actions  

I don't get it.

I don’t understand the “Fire Randy” talk at all. What exactly was he supposed to do? This accident could have just as easily happened with 24 or 26 cars on the grid as it did with 34 cars on the grid, so car count had little to do with it (and I’d say that the “extra” 6-8 cars in the Vegas race were already behind Dan at the time of the accident, so that’s kind of a red herring anyway). The fact that Dan was the driver up for the $5 million challenge? That’s what we call “an unfortunate coincidence”. This could have happened to literally any car in the field that was behind the top-4 or 5. Dan was taking no unnecessary risks, because the challenge was not to lead lap 20 after starting last, it was to lead lap 200. Which is exactly what happened at Indy this year, remember? Besides, Dan was probable to be doing the Vegas race MONTHS before he was the driver up for the $5 million challenge (a fact conveniently forgotten, or not even understood in the first place, by the people who say “he wouldn’t have even been in this race if it weren’t for the $5 million”).

Outside of those factors, which had little to no effect on the accident, or, say, Randy personally spending hundreds of hours in a wind tunnel in order to find a solution to the problem of pack racing (a problem that I think most people, myself very much included, were in denial as to how bad it was, though it’s certainly come into sharp focus in the last 8 days), what was he supposed to do? I’ve yet to hear a single one of the “Fire Randy” types offer up one concrete suggestion there.

by The Speedgeek on Oct 25, 2011 10:45 AM EDT reply actions  

On top of all of that...

… had Dan’s car not ended up turning and banking in midair the way it did, it may not have hit the fence is such a bad way, and Dan may well have been alive today. Granted, there’d still be a huge hue and cry over a 15 car pile-up, but it wouldn’t have been the sudden tragedy it ended up becoming.

Yes, I do also share the “flabbergastation” at all the “Fire Randy” talk myself. Tony is right; too many people are looking for a scapegoat and are not willing to actually think their way through the actual causative factors. As Tony pointed out either here or in Twitter (forget which), many of the factors – the car design, for example, which helped lead to pack racing – were already in play well before Bernard came into the sport. I’d wish people would actually take the trouble to analyze and critically think their way through an analysis, but it disappoints me to see that too many are too easily satisfied with a “burn the witch” mentality. I see it far too strongly in other sports (it’s been the Indiana University fanbase mentality for years now, and not just for football; it’s also been the Indianapolis Colts fans’ mentality too, even during the good years with Manning healthy and playing), and I see it in Indycar fandom and editorializing as well. Too many people call for “accountability” in their favorite sport, but they don’t stop and think what factors into genuine accountability. They certainly don’t stop and think what’s truly wrong, concentrating instead on pet peeves. It’s disappointing. I’d have hoped that the limited fanbase for Indycar would mean that we’d have far fewer casual, superficial fans like football and basketball does, as well as fewer generalized sports reporters and columnists writing about it, and therefore would have a greater proportion of fans and talking heads who’d have deeper knowledge about the sport, but I’m finding out that too many people are just too superficial in how they view it all.

Thank goodness for you, Speedgeek, and Tony here. You’re two people who are willing to actually look at the problems, instead of just cry “Off with His (Bernard’s) head!”.

--------
"First they came for the ugly, and I did not speak out because I was not ugly.
Then they came for the nerds, and I did not speak out because D&D IS A RESPECTABLE GAME WITH A LARGE PLAYERBASE OK MOM???
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out because let's be real they always come for the Jews.
Then they came for me, and I did not speak out because they actually came for me back when they came for the nerds."

--
"How can a pickup truck contain enough mass to unfold into a towering machine? I say if Ringling Brothers can get 15 clowns into a Volkswagen, anything is possible."

Roger Ebert, Transformers review.

by E.M.H. on Oct 26, 2011 8:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

No need to defend the boss

Your community of Sports fan does not need to defend the CEO he is paid to do a job and he is not doing his job by himself without any support. Randy had plenty of support in Vegas and this advertising campaign was plastered all over the city. This is not the dark ages and Indy-car fanatics are not living in a kingdom with a special designated class. This is an extreme competition that went very badly and someone lost a father, a husband and a friend. Randy Bernard is a grown up and he can handle the criticism if it comes his way. Some of these Indy-car fanatics have really gone off the deep end with their critique of journalists who are not paid in gum BTW. Maybe it is time for a change in tone and many of the drivers who actually survived this are still in shock probably so they have about five months to heal. The double-dog-dare was played out much like the hot wheels stunt at the Indy-500. It is time to take an about face and certainly the buck will stop with the decisions of the board of directors – who run this family owned business . This is not a kingdom it is a business. Business Law has terms that speak for themselves and R.B. probably went to business school: he is not a high school drop-out. Randy apologized for using poor advertising so he already admitted to some of his mistakes. The carnage happened-we all saw it. The race ended after 13 laps with 40% of the cars out. The entire incident was on regulated FCC airwaves so no need to recount what happened. The drivers need the time and the space to decide what is safe for them-
The New Jersey Formula-one event in 2012 will shed light on the standards of open-wheel racing…(since Indy-car is now only semi-open-wheel racing , with only 2 wheels –open and exposed) maybe the league could take a pause and get some help from the pros when they visit. We don’t need to use the Queen’s English but some decorum and regard would be helpful in this kind of situation. Daniel was a British gentleman after all.

by SonnyRawls on Oct 25, 2011 12:56 PM EDT reply actions  

Well written article...

This is going to be hard to summarize things without ranting on and on but I would support Randy Bernard in a second. Do I think there are things he can do differently? sure. But that goes with everyone in a power position. There’s always room for improvement. Do I blame him for Dan Wheldon’s passing? Of course not, and neither should anybody else. Randy Bernard brought some life back to a series that has been pretty boring for awhile now. People need to realize that the drivers know what they are doing and what the risks are everytime they climb into their car. It’s not like Randy Bernard held a gun to their head and said “You must drive” If they don’t want to drive a race car where they could potentially have an accident at any track/event and lose their life then there are many other professions out there for them to choose from. They do it because they love the thrill. Randy Bernard brought publicity that I haven’t seen in a long time back into this series. If the race had been completed without incident people would have been praising Bernard for what a great event it was set to be. Heck he even turned my boyfriend who had no interest what so ever in racing let alone Indycar into a now diehard fan. Do i think the series can learn from the incident? Of course and I hope they do. But do I think Randy Bernard deserves to be blamed and bashed (the majority of the time by journalists who have no clue what they are talking about) then my answer is no. Move along people. Let Indycar rebuild, regroup and find ways once again to make the sport safer. Don’t forget that the majority of the safety innovations that have kept those NASCAR drivers from death have come from CART & INDYCAR.

by Brittzbaby on Oct 26, 2011 1:48 AM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Pop Off Valve is your one-stop shop for IZOD IndyCar Series news and commentary on the SBNation network.

Join our community and let your voice be heard!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Jasonpierrepaul_small
IZOD IndyCar Series Gives Fans Access to Drivers Past and Present
Pop-off2_small
Purchase US-RACING photo calendar for Japan tsunami relief

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Support INDYCAR Sponsors!

SUPPORT INDYCAR SPONSORS

Visit the INDYCAR Sponsors site to see which companies are supporting your favorite form of motorsports. Throw some business their way if you can!

The SBN Indy 500 Primer

Need to get up to speed on the Indianapolis 500-Mile Race and the famed "Brickyard" - the Indianapolis Motor Speedway? Check out our three-part SBNation Indy 500 Primer:

The More You Know

About Pop Off Valve

Pop Off Valve [POP awf vālv] - noun 1. A spring-loaded relief mechanism on a turbocharged engine that releases excess pressure within the engine manifold; 2. An IndyCar blog intended to release excess opinion within the fan community.

Acronym: P.O.V.
(see also: Point of View)

"Running my mouth, that's my pop-off valve. It gives me a little bit of relief so I could get back to what I was doing." - Dale Earnhardt, Jr.

Copyright

©2011 Thunderbird Creative Media, LLC.
All rights reserved.

Theunions_medium


Editor-in-Chief

Pop-off2_small Tony Johns

Associate Editors

Wasted_years_av_hd2_small fleshwound_NPG

Correspondents

Dalenixon-thumb_small DaleNixon

Dsc_0344alter_small Scott Whitmore

Sunset_small Brian Neudorff