Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Yu Darvish Diagnosed With Mariners Fever

Beaux Barfield takes first step into vast IndyCar minefield

For Beaux Barfield, newly-announced director of Race Control for the IZOD IndyCar Series, each brick at the Indianapolis Motor Speedway start/finish line may be an unexploded mine. (Photo: IndyCar)

The first person that Beaux Barfield ought to call, now that he has been officially announced as the inheritor of the worst job in organized motorsports, is the NHL's Brendan Shanahan.

Those of you who follow professional ice hockey don't need to be told who Shanahan is. For the rest, let's describe Shanahan this way - he is the only player in NHL history to amass more than 600 goals and more than 2,000 penalty minutes. In other words, while he was still playing, he could score on you and then deprive you of your teeth, all in the same game.

Shanny's current gig is acting as the National Hockey League's Vice President of Hockey and Business Development. Impressive as that sounds, his main job is to act as "the NHL's top cop," a job formerly held by Colin Campbell, who was about as thoroughly reviled in his execution of the post as Brian Barnhart was when Barnhart ran IndyCar race control.

Star-divide

Campbell was frequently excoriated for his perceived subjectivity, no more so than when any sort of disciplinary issue arose around any team for which his son Gregory played. He was accused of inconsistency, a reticence to update his point of view to modern hockey (ironic, considering he chaired the committee that issued the massive post-lockout rule changes that fundamentally altered the face of pro hockey in North America), and favoritism - the latter issue coming to a contentious head when a series of his e-mail messages was published that showed Campbell complaining to the NHL's head referee about on-ice calls prejudicial to his son.

Campbell remains with the league as Director of Hockey Operations (sound familiar?), but Shanahan now is the League's top enforcer. The hard-nosed, determined way he played the game earned him plaudits when he took the job, because people respected his career and philosophy. Everyone believed that a renaissance was due for NHL rules policing.

To be fair, Shanahan has to date been more open and thorough in explaining his disciplinary decisions than any of his predecessors. His frame-by-frame video analyses hit the Internet at the same time as the press releases explaining suspensions or fines, and his self-justification is meticulous.

It's just too bad that nobody seems to appreciate all that work. Shanahan, once the knight in shining armor who was initially seen as rescuing a league in distress, is now the butt of endless second-guessing and criticism, and - amazingly - the target of the very same accusations of bias that eventually got Colie Campbell kicked out of his crib.

I mention all of this because Beaux Barfield is in for the same treatment. It's a virtual certainty. Hockey and racing have much more in common than you think - most critically, a bipartisan fanbase whose loyalties are so divided that it is impossible to please either side, and competitors whose ego and self-interest is matched only by their utter indifference to how poisonous such attitudes are for the greater good.

Sure, right now the atmosphere is jovial and hopeful - much like it was when Shanahan took the reins - based on Barfield's stated assurances that, to paraphrase, "the buck stops here" and the idea that having too much competition regulation quantified in rulebook form, such as the infamous blocking rules that drew so much ire from fans and drivers alike, is his anathema. This begs the question, however: will fans and competitors be any happier if Barfield interprets racing situations on a case by case basis based on a nebulous, relaxed set of guidelines than they were when Barnhart inconsistently enforced strict, minutely-outlined rules?

A more important question lurks in the background, and that is - will IndyCar fans ever be satisfied? Because really, Barfield is as much a savior as Shanahan is, which means he is not one at all. He is simply a new face with a new philosophy - not necessarily a better one. And what that means is that sometime around midseason in 2012, Beaux Barfield likely will be weathering a withering fusillade of second-guessing and criticisms for how he does his job.

I don't know Beaux Barfield personally, but I hear tell that he is well-regarded by those he has worked with previously. He comes highly-recommended... but then again, so did Brendan Shanahan. And here's the thing - Shanahan is doing a fine job for the NHL, and I have no doubt that Barfield will do the same for IndyCar, particularly given his experience.

Maybe he'll even get the proper credit for it, too - he'll probably just have to wait until he's retired.

Comment 5 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Come on

“weathering a withering fusillade”, Tony? Making sure we’re not asleep here? Straight up trying to impress NewTrackRecord Mark with the vocab? Trying to delay the next Miller’s Mailbag for a couple of hours while Robin reads an entire thesaurus, trying to figure out what you’re talking about?

by The Speedgeek on Jan 5, 2012 7:13 PM EST reply actions  

Are you kidding? Robin probably stopped at "Shanahan" and wondered "What does football have to do with this?" ;)

--------
"First they came for the ugly, and I did not speak out because I was not ugly.
Then they came for the nerds, and I did not speak out because D&D IS A RESPECTABLE GAME WITH A LARGE PLAYERBASE OK MOM???
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out because let's be real they always come for the Jews.
Then they came for me, and I did not speak out because they actually came for me back when they came for the nerds."

--
"How can a pickup truck contain enough mass to unfold into a towering machine? I say if Ringling Brothers can get 15 clowns into a Volkswagen, anything is possible."

Roger Ebert, Transformers review.

by E.M.H. on Jan 6, 2012 1:20 PM EST up reply actions  

From: New Track Record

And I AM impressed. Not only with the vocabulary, but also with the alliteration of “weathering a withering.” Now that’s powerful stuff. Best of luck to the new race director. Laissez les bon temps rouler, Beaux.

by Checkered Past on Jan 5, 2012 9:26 PM EST reply actions  

Good article

I am excited with Beaux. I don’t follow ALMS real close, but from what I saw it was practically a no contact league. If he keeps that constant, I think the fans and drivers will show some respect.

TN Sports fan in Hoosier Country....

by Evanbio on Jan 7, 2012 7:58 AM EST reply actions  

Please don't lump us all together...

“… – will Indycar fans ever be satisfied?”

I appreciate the details of comparison and do have the same concerns as you TJ, and I will further grant you there are more than a few extremely vocal, incorrigible, and outright hateful people who’ve found their voice among the sites, forums, and various outlets of the internet…

BUT,

I still have to believe they are clearly the minority. Perhaps not so on certain sites which is why I choose to not traffic those dens of perpetual dissatisfaction and I will go so far as to say they’re not really fans at all, but purely disgruntled human beings who’ve found a platform to publicly share their life’s misery.

I, for one, consider myself a fan (not an apologist) and, while things can always be better no matter the venue, choose to understand that this (and all other) sport is not the only thing of consequence in life and that people are working quite hard to make this sport better and grow. To be clear, I’m sure you aren’t meaning to lump the relatively calm majority of fans with those curmudgeonly forum-rats but I am saddened that they are loud enough to become of concern to the majority. If this is truly the case, the the ‘terrorists’ are winning.

So to answer your question – Yes, many will be satisfied, some won’t care, and some will never be satisfied no matter the issue. Let’s just remember those perpetually dissatisfied souls don’t represent who or what they purport.

PS Geaux Beaux!

by GroundedEffects on Jan 10, 2012 9:10 AM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Pop Off Valve is your one-stop shop for IZOD IndyCar Series news and commentary on the SBNation network.

Join our community and let your voice be heard!

FanPosts

Support INDYCAR Sponsors!

SUPPORT INDYCAR SPONSORS

Visit the INDYCAR Sponsors site to see which companies are supporting your favorite form of motorsports. Throw some business their way if you can!

The SBN Indy 500 Primer

Need to get up to speed on the Indianapolis 500-Mile Race and the famed "Brickyard" - the Indianapolis Motor Speedway? Check out our three-part SBNation Indy 500 Primer:

The More You Know

About Pop Off Valve

Pop Off Valve [POP awf vālv] - noun 1. A spring-loaded relief mechanism on a turbocharged engine that releases excess pressure within the engine manifold; 2. An IndyCar blog intended to release excess opinion within the fan community.

Acronym: P.O.V.
(see also: Point of View)

"Running my mouth, that's my pop-off valve. It gives me a little bit of relief so I could get back to what I was doing." - Dale Earnhardt, Jr.

Copyright

©2011 Thunderbird Creative Media, LLC.
All rights reserved.

Theunions_medium


Editor-in-Chief

Pop-off2_small Tony Johns

Associate Editors

Wasted_years_av_hd2_small fleshwound_NPG

Correspondents

Dalenixon-thumb_small DaleNixon

Dsc_0344alter_small Scott Whitmore

Sunset_small Brian Neudorff